Himachal Pradesh High Court M/S Lakhwinder Sigh Stone Crushers vs . Uoi & Ors. on 7 November, 2023 Bench: ... A Seven Judge Bench of Hon'ble Supreme Court in India Cement Ltd. and others Vs. State of Tamil Nadu and others, (1990)1 Supreme Court Cases 12, has declared that royalty itself is a tax. This declaration of law is binding on the ...
→ WhatsApp: +86 18221755073
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD ?Court No. - 1 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 10832 of 2020 Petitioner :- Chaudhary Yashwant Singh ... Magistrate had forwarded report dated 20.04.2019 in respect of illegal stone crushers recommending action against four crusher units. Further, on 05.08.2019 after considering the remedial ...
→ WhatsApp: +86 18221755073
In a recent judgement of M/S MATRI STONE CRUSHER & ORS.VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS. - 2024 (11) TMI 375 - HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT has held that the revenue is well within their rights to levy GST on the royalty paid by the mineral concession holder for any mining concession granted by the State Government.. The issue before the hon'ble …
→ WhatsApp: +86 18221755073
Get free access to the complete judgment in SRI. THAZHATHERI HASHIM, v. M/S SUPER STONE CRUSHER on CaseMine.
→ WhatsApp: +86 18221755073
Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati M/S. Anjani Stone Crusher, vs The State Of Andhra Pradesh on 16 February, 2021 Author: D Ramesh Bench: D Ramesh (SHOW CAUSE NOTICE BEFORE ADMISSION) IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (SPECIAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION) TUESDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY …
→ WhatsApp: +86 18221755073
Remedial steps and even plans for mining and crushing have been ordered by the National Green Tribunal to be chalked out by the State and a Committee has been appointed under its order. …
→ WhatsApp: +86 18221755073
M/S.J.R.S. CRUSHER Madras High Court Oct 20, 2021; Subsequent References; CaseIQ (AI Recommendations) T. JAGANATHAN v. M/S.J.R.S. CRUSHER. ... the property to a third party to one Mr.T.Jaganathan while the matter is subjudice before this Court and before Hon'ble High Court also. Under these circumstances I do not have any hestitation to pass an ...
→ WhatsApp: +86 18221755073
, 2021 Latest Caselaw 12471 Ker
→ WhatsApp: +86 18221755073
The Himachal Pradesh High Court has dismissed a writ petition challenging notifications issued by the Central government for levy of GST on Royalty paid by a Mineral Concession Holder for mining...
→ WhatsApp: +86 18221755073
Get free access to the complete judgment in M/S AMBALA STONE CRUSHER AND ORS v. STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS on CaseMine. ... In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, at Chandigarh Civil Writ Petition No. 12107 of 2018 (O&M) Reserved On: 19.11.2024. Pronounced On: 29.11.2024.
→ WhatsApp: +86 18221755073
(3) A person shall not be qualified for appointment as a judge of a Special Court unless he is or has been a District and Sessions Judge. (4) Any person aggrieved by the order of the Special Court may prefer an - 5 - NC: 2024:KHC:15715 CRL.P No. 10780 of 2023 appeal to the High Court within a period of sixty days from the date of such order." 4.
→ WhatsApp: +86 18221755073
live streaming of court proceedings notice no.a/1258 dated 21.02.2025 notifying that interview-interaction of those advocates, who have applied for designation of senior advocate, is scheduled to be held on 03.03.2025, 04.03.2025 & …
→ WhatsApp: +86 18221755073
Get free access to the complete judgment in M/S SAI MAHALAKSHMI STONE CRUSHER, v. STATE OF KARNATAKA on CaseMine. Get free access to the complete judgment in M/S SAI MAHALAKSHMI STONE CRUSHER, v. STATE OF KARNATAKA on CaseMine. ... 5 - NC: 2024:KHC:15715 CRL.P No. 10780 of 2023 appeal to the High Court within a period of …
→ WhatsApp: +86 18221755073
It is also submitted that, Rule 18 W.P.(C) Nos.4112 & 13134 of 2018 6 of Rules, 2011 deals only with the crusher units and the petitioner's unit is not a crusher unit, but a quarry unit and therefore, Rule 18 will not apply to the licence application submitted by the petitioner.
→ WhatsApp: +86 18221755073
We would like to show you a description here but the site won't allow us.
→ WhatsApp: +86 18221755073
-1- in the high court of karnataka at bengaluru dated this the 12th day of january, 2022 present the hon'ble mr. ritu raj awasthi, chief justice and the hon'ble mr.justice suraj govindaraj writ petition 4215 of 2021 (gm-mms) between: 1. ... manu stone crusher rep by its proprietor sri. g.a. komalegowda aged about 62 years chinakurali ...
→ WhatsApp: +86 18221755073
Read this exciting story from The Business Guardian November 12, 2024 issue. The Himachal Pradesh High Court in the case M/s Lakhwinder Singh Stone Crusher v. Union of India & ors. observed and has dismissed a writ petition challenging notifications issued by the Central government for levy of GST on Royalty paid by a Mineral Concession Holder for mining …
→ WhatsApp: +86 18221755073
The High Court upheld the validity of the Third Amendment but invalidated the Fourth and Fifth Amendments. The orders passed by the High Court are stayed to the extent of the invalidated amendments. Rule 5 seeks to impose transit fee on forest produce, with the definition of "forest produce" as per Section 2(4) of the Forest Act, 1927. Issues: 1.
→ WhatsApp: +86 18221755073
Rajasthan High Court M/S Haryana Stone Crusher vs Raj State Pollution Control on 20 July, 2010 ... The anxiety of the High Court was further exhibited by its concern in the matter in constituting an Expert Committee and although that Expert Committee stated that a distance of 1 km is a safe distance between the site under quarry lease and the ...
→ WhatsApp: +86 18221755073
No.673/1993 (Stone Crusher Owners Association & others vs. Madhya Pradesh Electricity Board & others) decided on 19.10.1994. Inevitable conclusion: (i) In Division Bench judgment of this Court in Stone Crusher Association's case (supra) though the argument was raised on behalf of the respondent-
→ WhatsApp: +86 18221755073
Get free access to the complete judgment in M/S S.S. STONE CRUSHER v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND on CaseMine. Get free access to the complete judgment in M/S S.S. STONE CRUSHER v. ... we are of the view that the High Court ought not to have presumed that the award of the Labour Court for grant of back wages is implied in the relief of reinstatement ...
→ WhatsApp: +86 18221755073
Stone Crusher of respondent no.5 which is operating in violation of orders passed by this Hon'ble Court, Hon'ble Apex Court and Hon'ble NGT and also in violation of UK Stone Crusher, Screening Plant, Pulveriser, Mobile Stone Crusher Permit Policy. 2. Issue a …
→ WhatsApp: +86 18221755073
So AND WHEREAS the High Court, upon perusing the petition and affidavit filed herein and upon hearing the arguments of Sri K.Chidambaram, learned counsel! representing …
→ WhatsApp: +86 18221755073
I have perused the order dated 26-6-2007 passed by the Division Bench of this Court and I find that the controversy involved in the instant writ petition stands resolved by the order dated 26-6-2007 passed by this Court in Writ Petition No. 993 of 2004(M/B) M/s Gupta Builders v. State of Uttaranchal This Court in paragraph 22 has observed as under:
→ WhatsApp: +86 18221755073
in the high court of karnataka at bengaluru . dated this the 7 th day of january, 2025 . present . the hon'ble mr n. v. anjaria, chief justice . and . the hon'ble mr justice m.i.arun writ petition no. 30895 of 2024 (gm-mm_s) between: 1. m/s. nandini stone crusher. reptd. by its partner. sri ganesh s/o narayanaswamy annagouni. aged about 40 ...
→ WhatsApp: +86 18221755073
Shimla (Himachal Pradesh) [India], January 10 (Diary Times): The Himachal Pradesh High Court has directed the state government, the Pollution Control Board, and two stone crushers owned by the MLA from Doon to respond to allegations of illegal mining and environmental violations. The petition, lodged by Krishna Kumar, raises concerns over the …
→ WhatsApp: +86 18221755073
Get free access to the complete judgment in RAPHY JOHN v. OMEGA STONE CRUSHER on CaseMine.
→ WhatsApp: +86 18221755073
(1) The order passed in writ petition no. 5768/2008 (m/s, anu stone crusher v. Bank of india and others) will also govern the disposal of wrti petition no. 5770/2008 (M/s. Bajaj Stone Crusher v. Bank of India and others) and writ petition no. 5781/2008 (m/s. Saroj stone crusher v. Bank of india and others).
→ WhatsApp: +86 18221755073
HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA –––– 171 001171 001 No. HHC/Rules/14-61/90-V- Dated: 3.12.2015 NOTIFICATION In exercise of the powers vested under Clause (2) of Article 229 of the Constitution of India and all other enabling provisions in this behalf
→ WhatsApp: +86 18221755073
The petition alleges that these stone crushers are extracting massive quantities of minerals far exceeding the initially approved limits, employing hundreds of trucks for …
→ WhatsApp: +86 18221755073
Stone Crusher-sold by certified Suppliers,such as Jaw / Cone / Impact / Mobile Crusher,etc.
GET QUOTE
